London Financial Times
Feb 1, 1999
FAMILY FILMS: G is for good takings, R is for rotten
Hollywood's
family films make eight times more profit than ones with exploding heads, an advocacy
group says. Christopher Parkes reports
R, the Hollywood rating code for films depicting
sex, violence and other content unsuitable for family viewing, serves a double purpose as
a sign of a rotten rate of return on investment, according to a study of 10 years' worth
of studio output. G signifies good - as in clean fun and gross earnings - says the Dove Foundation, an advocacy group for
more wholesome entertainment, which claims the average film with a "general"
rating generates eight times more gross profit than an R-rated shocker.
In terms of return on investment, family fare is 78 per cent more rewarding than blood
and guts. Coming shortly after Walt Disney announced plans to re-focus its efforts on
family films, the report may strike a chord among studios that are struggling to find a
formula for consistent box office success.
Dove, using data commissioned from Paul Kagan Associates, a respected research firm,
claims its findings "completely debunk" film-makers' claims that films stuffed
with "naked bodies, exploding heads and filthy language" make most money.
Although the findings on profitability are based on estimates of numbers studios never
reveal, but are commonly used as rule-of-thumb measures of success, the results seem to
suggest scarcity value is a financial factor.
Of the 2,380 films given a wide US release (on 800 or more screens) in the decade to
the end of 1997, only 75 were given a G rating. Walt Disney's main label, Buena Vista,
provided 23 of those, with Warner Bros a distant second with 13.
Sony, which came close to collapse in the period under scrutiny, was the most prolific
studio, with a total of 271 releases; it put out the most R-rated pictures (137) and made
only four with the G rating. Since 1968, Dove says, 60 per cent of all releases have been
rated R.
Dick Rolfe, the foundation's chief executive, has sent copies of the report to studio
executives and mutual fund and pension fund managers, in an effort to persuade both groups
to review their policies "for profit's sake".
Average gross profit from a G-rated film in the review period was $94m, the study says,
with R movies yielding only $11m apiece and PG products about $26m. Gross profit is
defined as the studios' estimated revenues from cinemas, home video, and television rights
minus production and promotion costs.
According to the data, G and PG films enjoyed a come-back between 1993 and 1996, as the
number of R-rated releases fell to a low of 99 in 1994, but the tide turned quickly, and
the tally of films unsuitable for family audiences hit a record 169 in 1997.
The change in the mix reflects the studios' pursuit of young males, the most persistent
cinema-goers, and their response to the early adoption of adult tastes by children which
has lately afflicted toy industry sales. Effects-heavy action films, commonly rated PG-13
or PG, are widely accepted in the marketplace as family viewing.
The Dove Foundation,
supported by entertainment names such as Steve Allen and Michael Medved, securities
executives and the former head coach of the Dallas Cowboys, acknowledges this shift with a
less rigid stance than some advocacy groups.
It has given its "family approved" seal to several serious, R-rated films,
including Steven Spielberg's Schindler's List and Saving Private Ryan. "Moviegoers
are not crying out for endless sequels of Rugrats and Babe," says Mr
Rolfe, who rates the newly-released Star Trek: Insurrection (PG) as acceptable
family viewing.
In his opinion Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life and Alfred Hitchcock's North by Northwest bear the mark of genius. But they don't make them like that any more.