Hollywood And The Family

A COLUMN BY Dick Rolfe Chairman, THE DOVE FOUNDATION

March 1997


 GUEST SPEAKS OUT FROM MY SOAP BOX

As I began developing my column this month, I thought I would write something profound about my disappointment with the Academy Awards nominees this year. Then, after reading the article below which my friend, Phil Boatwright penned for the Baptist Press, I decided to loan him my "soap box" since his observations are so similar to my own.

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

THE 69TH ACADEMY AWARDS - WHAT A (disappointing) DIFFERENCE A YEAR MAKES!

by Phil Boatwright, The Movie Reporter

Last year, the five films up for Best Picture each embraced positive messages. "Apollo 13," "Babe," "Braveheart," "The Postman" and "Sense & Sensibility" beat out the heavier and often depressing themes of "Leaving Las Vegas," "Casino" and "Nixon." This year, however, the tides have changed. The five nominees for the Oscar lean toward the darker side.

"The English Patient," "Fargo," "Jerry Maguire," "Secrets & Lies," and "Shine" were well made, and in several cases contained a strong message, but they were each so congested with profanity, mental and physical abuse and somber subject matter, it made going to the movies a rather unpleasant experience.

Each film was populated with one or more of the following characters: kidnappers, adulterers, fornicators, abusers, hypocrites, pornographers etc, etc. Even "Shine," which boasted an uplifting ending, sort of, had a father figure so abusive, you'd think you were watching all of Charles Dickens' antagonists rolled into one. If there is a lesson to be learned from these people, doesn't the oppressive material counter any positive we may have gained? If we sit through two hours of vituperation to get to the 5 minute cheery epilogue, what happens to our psyche during the process?

For example: The dark comedy "Fargo" - Siskel & Ebert's favorite film of the year - received its R-rating for lots of profane, obscene and crude language throughout. There were also sexual situations, murder, extreme brutality, including whippings, beatings, close-up gun shots with lots of blood, an ax murder, and a body disposed of in a wood chipper. That's not all. Let's not forget the kidnapping, where we saw a blindfolded woman falling on her face in the frigid snow, as she attempted escape, with her abductors bemused at the tableau. Several members of the audience were doing the same. Ok, ok it's only a movie, but I found little humor in watching a terrified woman treated like a piece of meat.

A frightening trend in pictures began with Scorsese's "Goodfellas," and was soon copied by "Pulp Fiction," where the filmmakers' ability to incorporate insensitive humor just after a visual brutality made the violent act palatable and strangely hypnotic to the viewer. "Fargo" carried on in this vain, making it a brutal, cynical and desensitizing film.

If this were an anomaly, I might find some value in the quality of the film. What's happening to us, when 4 out of 5 films up for the Best Picture Oscar are rated R? Is this the only way we can be amused?

Lastly, I counted five nominated films in several categories containing characters that deny the existence of God. What's that all about? Hollywood seems so pleased with itself in denigrating people of faith, aiming their hostility at the sanctimonious, but seldom elevating those who practice what they preach. True, positive examples are harder to find, but I get the impression from my hundreds of yearly visits to the local cineplex, that the Entertainment Community isn't even looking.

There were exceptions this past year such as "Big Night," "Emma," "Mother," "That Thing You Do," and "Looking for Richard." But, if you wanted to see serious subject matter, you had to allow yourself to be pummeled with violence and objectionable language. If you're looking for uplifting, nourishing entertainment on home video, you had better rent last year’s nominees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Phil Boatwright is editor of The Movie Reporter, a biweekly newsletter that critiques most major films from a Christian perspective. To subscribe, send your check for $16.95 ($14,95 for e-mail version) to Central Christian Publications, P.O. Box 7178, Thousand Oaks, CA 9135.

Find Dove on the Info Superhighway

 

World Wide Web Home Page: http://www.dove.org
Send Internet e-mail to:
movies@dove.org
Mailing list request: 1-800-218-DOVE

Subscribe to our FREE 'In Flight' newsletter and quarterly video list.


Dick Rolfe is Chairman of The Dove Foundation a nonprofit organization whose mission is to encourage and promote the creation, production and distribution of wholesome family entertainment. For more information about wholesome films and videos, write: 535 E. Fulton, Suite 1A, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, or call (616)454-5024.


Return to our home page | Dick's bio | past columns


We are interested in your comments and/or questions.
Call us in the U.S. or Canada at 1-800-968-8437
To contact Dick Rolfe about this or related topics,
send
email to dickrolfe@dove.org
Dove Seal Updated by: Scott Rolfe
IT Director,
The Dove Foundation

Copyright © 1997, The Dove Foundation. All rights reserved.